Resurrection of the Shroud: New Scientific, Medical, and Archeological Evidence
| Author | : | |
| Rating | : | 4.81 (978 Votes) |
| Asin | : | 0871318903 |
| Format Type | : | paperback |
| Number of Pages | : | 340 Pages |
| Publish Date | : | 2016-03-06 |
| Language | : | English |
DESCRIPTION:
. Antonacci has spent much of the past seventeen years investigating the Shroud of Turin
From Library Journal The Shroud of Turin, which some claim to be the burial cloth of Jesus, has been surrounded in controversy, which this book is unlikely to settle. Antonacci concludes that Jesus emitted a kind of radiation "that did not harm his body or immediately affect his clothes. It will, however, provide an extensive, though not necessarily balanced, introduction to issues surrounding the Shroud. Attorney Antonacci reviews previous scientific investigations of the Shroud, examines the image embedded in it, and investigates theories that the image was produced by painting. He looks at archaeological artifacts and reviews scientific challenges to the issue of carb
"An exhaustive, extremely well researched look at the Shroud of Turin" according to M@rk. This book is an absolutely exhaustive look at the Shroud of Turin. The author delves into the history, science, and theology of the Shroud of Turin. I call it the Resurrection Shroud of Christ for that is what it is. If you're being rational and objective, you simply cannot read this book and come to any other conclusion but that the Shroud was created at the moment of Jesus Christ's resurrection. It's. Another Honest Skeptic Converted! Grimmy Kirkus Reviews once again exposes their rabid bias see their other "reviews" on similar topics. What is the source of their contempt? Is there just one anti-Christian reviewer assigned to books with religious implications? Does he worship at the altar of Spong? I'll have to take a look later. But I think we can accurately describe the last third of the "review" as standard, vague, boilerplate, fundame. A book that must not be ignored Bertrand Russell, a well-known atheist, was once asked what he would say if, after he died, he found that God indeed did exist. Unfazed in the least, Russell answered: "I would tell him: 'Not enough evidence, God. You didn't provide enough evidence.'"Well, it's 2001, and scientists have been busy at work studying the Shroud of Turin for the past twenty years. But as usual, the mass media have told ever
In Resurrection of the Shroud , Mark Antonacci authoritatively and scientifically challenges radiocarbon testing and presents new evidence in determining the Shroud's true age.